think twice drama

theatre art redux

Category: smart new plays (page 1 of 2)

RETURNING TO REIMS

RETURNING TO REIMS

RETURNING TO REIMS, based on the memoir of Didier Eribon, directed by Thomas Ostermeier, featuring Nina Hoss

WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE

A THINK TWICE DRAMA VIEW

As remarkable as RETURNING TO REIMS is for what it does, it is even more surprising for what it doesn’t.

RETURNING TO REIMS doesn’t entertain or pander to the consumer in us as commercial theatre does . . . Rather, it awakens our interest in our own lives.

It doesn’t attempt to transform its audience into a gratified mob satisfied that theatrical justice has been exacted . . . It appeals to each of us as individuals capable of taking actions beyond the stage that are divergent, positive, and necessary.

It doesn’t rely on standard plot progression and escalating conflict to hold our interest and to arrive at a payoff . . . It values discussion and agreement over conflict and story closure.

It doesn’t fall into a reassuring pattern of satire and vitriol against the present . . . It doesn’t vent at easy targets.  It addresses the current state of global politics through reminding us of the recent past.

Continue reading

NEW HEART & FURY FROM ADRIENNE KENNEDY

HE BROUGHT HER HEART BACK IN A BOX--Adrienne Kennedy

Adrienne Kennedy

A THINK TWICE DRAMA worth the wait:

HE BROUGHT HER HEART BACK IN A BOX

The sad, aching thing about Adrienne Kennedy’s new play set in the Jim Crow South of 1941 is how relevant it is today to our divided nation. This disturbing and haunted one act–produced by Theatre for a New Audience–is the world premiere of the first new Adrienne Kennedy play in almost a decade.

HE BROUGHT HER HEART BACK IN A BOX is a two-character dramatic recital as cerebral and deep as anything you may experience on the stage.  Under the often sweet surface, HEART simmers with rage against the violence of segregation and abuse of power in wartime Montefiore, Georgia.  And well beyond.

Continue reading

THINK TWICE REVIEW: PEOPLE PLACES & THINGS

 Irony of Irony: PEOPLE, PLACES & THINGS at ST. ANN’S WAREHOUSE

A Doctor tries to hand medication to the patient Emma in PEOPLE, PLACES & THINGS

credit: Johan Persson

The American Premiere of Duncan Macmillan’s PEOPLE, PLACES & THINGS at St. Ann’s Warehouse is a thought piece and a gutsy gorgeous thing to behold.  It is also darkly comic.  The play opens meta-theatrically, in mid-sentence. 

And we aren’t the audience we thought we were.  We find ourselves well within another play.  Act IV, the concluding pages of Chekhov’s frequently-produced The Seagull. 

The heroine/anti-heroine Emma of PEOPLE, PLACES & THINGS is playing Chekhov’s actress Nina to harrowing and comic effect.  This as we shift our expectations to accommodate an excerpt from this late 19th century work.  It is clear that Emma (a magnificent Denise Gough) is drunk on stage.  Her posture suggests a marionette with a couple of strings cut.  Emma has hit rock bottom during this performance.  As she fumbles to remember her lines, she begins to talk less in the character of Nina and more as herself.  The modes of reality between the role and the performer begin to blur.

Continue reading

SUSAN LORI PARKS’ IN THE BLOOD, PART 2

THE COMIC TRAGIC TONE OF SUSAN LORI PARKS’ IN THE BLOOD 

Have you had the chance to see IN THE BLOOD by Susan Lori Parks?  BLOOD is playing now at the Signature Theatre. If so, what did you think? Please click the comment button under the title. It would be great to hear what you think of the play.

After first seeing and then reading BLOOD, there is so much I admire in this production. Though the subject has been drawn from Nathanial Hawthorne’s Scarlet Letter, the tone of IN THE BLOOD is more complex than the novel’s relentlessly somber narrative.

It is well known that Hawthorne wrote the story of Hester Prynne, at least in part, to exorcise his guilt over the severity of the Puritan character in his seventeenth century ancestors in Salem. Some of whom participated in the Salem Witch Trials.

Hawthorne and Scarlett Letter

Inspiration for PARKS’ IN THE BLOOD: Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter

In reading excerpts of the novel it is discernable where Parks may have taken inspiration and reimagined the story’s components in modern terms. Before he introduces his readers to Hester Prynne, Hawthorne puts forward a representative of the law.

 

 

The door of the jail being flung open from within there appeared, in the first place, like a black shadow emerging into sunshine, the grim and gristly presence of the town-beadle, with a sword by his side, and his staff of office in his hand.

A policeman doesn’t appear in BLOOD.  But one is described chasing after what turns out to be his stolen policeman’s club. Which has been stolen by her son Trouble. Hester’s oldest daughter Bully describes what has transpired.

He had a big stomach. Like he was pregnant. He was jiggling and running and yelling and red in the face.

What is ominous for its symbolic and punitive qualities in Hawthorne’s lawman translates for Parks into comic imagery. (One can picture Oliver Hardy in hot pursuit.) But there’s more than comedy at stake. Once Hester takes the billy club away from her thieving son Trouble, she becomes the holder of this moral instrument.

Parks' IN THE BLOOD baby picture and billy club

Hester played by Saycon Sengbloh of Parks’ IN THE BLOOD with baby picture and billy club (photo by Joan Marcus)

Moreover, Hester will brandish the club at emotional peaks in the drama. The use of the word “pregnant” in the context of a male authority figure reverberates through out the play.  (The scenes with the Doctor, the Minister, and her First Boyfriend Chili.)  The “big-stomached” policeman’s authoritative, yet futile anger is passed like a baton.  To the angry mother of five who becomes increasingly desperate as the play goes.

What begins with slapstick imagery, reminiscent of silent films, is developed tragically as in the theater of Bertolt Brecht. Especially, as in Mother Courage and Her Children.   Parks’ Hester La Negrita is not fighting for survival on the sidelines of an historic European war, but during ordinary times in modern America. The androgynous image of the pregnant-looking policeman chasing Hester’s bastard child Trouble is central to the play.  The result of  his losing his policeman’s stick to Hester resonants through out.  It symbolizes the complicity of society, men and women, in evoking Hester’s tragedy.

Susan Lori Parks’ IN THE BLOOD: A THINK TWICE REVIEW

Review of Signature’s IN THE BLOOD by Susan Lori Parks

Red Letter Plays

Susan Lori Parks, IN THE BLOOD and FUCKING A are The Red Letter Plays, riffs on The Scarlet Letter

If you haven’t seen Susan Lori Parks’ IN THE BLOOD, it is time.  To go.  The Signature Theatre has launched a powerful and very timely revival of this important play.   IN THE BLOOD is a riff on Nathanial Hawthorne’s Scarlet Letter.   It is that rare play that packs both an emotional and intellectual wallop.   A motherly one.   Somehow it  comes off as both timeless and composed from today’s news.

IN THE BLOOD was written twenty years ago and first performed at the Public Theater in 1999.  It is partly a conversation between authors from different eras.  Parks today and Hawthorne in 1850.  It is also a fierce indictment of an ageless problem.  False morality that serves opportunism.

Continue reading

TINA HOWE & DRAMA OF THE UNINTELLIGIBLE PART 1

An Interview with Anne Washburn and Chisa Hutchinson

In the “Language Issue” of The Dramatist (Jan/Feb 2016) Tina Howe interviews Anne Washburn and Chisa Hutchinson. The subject is inventing languages. Both Washburn and Hutchinson have created and utilized imaginary languages in plays.

No stranger to make-believe idioms, Tina Howe leads a remarkable discussion. One that goes beyond an appreciation of what’s murky, unclear, and ambiguous in the theatre. As an interviewer she is articulate, manic, and uniquely qualified.

Tina Howe is best known for zany and irreverent plays that explore feminine terrain with Ionesco-like absurdity. During the interview the three women lapse into fluent playwright-speak, a language of its own, that is a pleasure to read. If you have the opportunity, read the interview in its entirety. It’s well worth it.

Howe ingeniously peppers the interviewees with questions, a half-dozen at a time. This strategy opens up a broad field of inquiry for Washburn and Hutchinson to respond to. One that fits the subject of order growing out of chaos. Quickly both of the interviewed playwrights hone in on what they want to say.

Tina Howe: mermaid and harp

Tina Howe and Imaginary Languages in Drama (alain kementieva fantasy)

Germ Idea for a Play in Zurich

Anne Washburn describes the genesis of her play The Internationalist. The play grew out of an experience she had while visiting Zurich as a document manager for a Swiss re-insurance company. She recalls hearing a story told, in English for her benefit, by a Swiss colleague.

–about a woman who thinks her cat is being attacked by a fox and rushes out into the backyard to save it, and wrestles what she thinks is the cat away from the fox and then discovers that she is holding a weasel instead, and the fox is looking at her in astonishment, and the weasel is looking at her in astonishment, and then the weasel and the fox exchange a look. It’s just a wonderful story about communication and miscommunication.

Then another colleague follows up this story with one that begins in English but lapses into Swiss-German and never returns. This story puts Washburn into the position of guessing at its meaning sonically. Intuiting a hypothetical, personalized fictive meaning according to the rhythms and cadences of the story told in Swiss-German.

Continue reading

PLAYWRIGHT INTENT–CHINA DOLL PART 3

Playwright and Reviewer Gap

For most plays there’s a gap between what the playwright intends and what the reviewer receives. For CHINA DOLL the gap between intent and reception has been unusually wide. Even though some reviewers cried “obvious,” they didn’t glean the less than obvious contributions toward the theme of Mamet’s play. 

It seemed to many that CHINA DOLL is just a one-sided parlor drama in which David Mamet forgot to include other characters and wouldn’t let Al Pacino’s character get off the phone.  They missed the machine-gun dialogue they’d come to expect from Mamet.  They wished for the things ordinary Broadway plays have.

Maybe someone can answer this.  Do reviewers really not understand the plays they don’t like?  Or is it aggressive helplessness?  Faux-floundering that condemns in the safest possible means?  “I just didn’t get it.”  Rather than debate a sociological theme or psychological insight that a play like CHINA DOLL has put forward, reviewer haplessness puts the blame squarely on the playwright.  

If this is true, why?  Maybe it’s because dismissing a play as horrible is easier, less dangerous and dirty, than debating.  Attacking a play for its look and feel risk nothing. Posing an argument is dangerous for some, beneath the dignity of others.  An argument reveals too much and no one in good taste reveals too much.  Better to attack the surface, the “touchy feely” aspects, of the production.  Many reviewers seem furious that CHINA DOLL isn’t pretty.  Trouble with opinions is that when they appear in print they masquerade as facts.  The reviews say CHINA DOLL is horrible, therefore it must be a fact.  Jonathan Mandell of the DC Theatre Scene comments:

David Mamet’s CHINA DOLL involves two dramas. There’s the one on stage starring Al Pacino as an old billionaire in the something of a cynical primer on wealth and political ambition. Then there’s the pile-on against the show: The reviews have been the worst anything on Broadway has gotten this whole year. [. . .] With only a few exceptions, the reviewers have sounded hostile, one calling the play “garbage.”

Continue reading

MAMET & PACINO REDUX—CHINA DOLL Part 2

David Mamet, WHO is CHINA DOLL?

In the smart new Mamet play, who (or what) does the title refer to? A great question! Unless I’m mistaken, the words “china doll” are not spoken. I took it that the title refers to the girlfriend Francine Pearson. Or, more precisely, Mickey Ross’s perception of her. How Ms. Pearson “appears” in his psyche. How he has fashioned her in his mind.

In the first act of the play, Ross lays it out in simplistic terms. Francine didn’t marry him for looks or for youth. She married him for money. He never factors in that there are subtle factors for which a person might marry. He tells Carson that a beautiful woman will always be able to entertain many offers and she will simply choose the best offer. Ross beholds Francine as a beautiful and brittle object. She is a figurine needing his protection, a valuable chess piece for him to move around his psychic game board.

In Beckett’s important work Endgame, Hamm’s first words are “Me . . . to play.”  In CHINA DOLL, Mamet dramatizes the final moves of Mickey Ross, the play’s Machiavellian anti-hero.

Shakespeare's King Lear, a mirror for Mamet and China Doll

Fool (Richard O’Callaghan) and Lear (Tim Pigott Smith in The West Yorkshire Playhouse’s KING LEAR. In CHINA DOLL by David Mamet, Ross is Lear-like for his rage and folly.

Characters in Endgame are inspiration for Ross and Carson in Mamet CHINA DOLL

Hamm (George Roth) and Clov (Terrence Cranendonk) in Endgame produced by the Cleveland Museum of Art (2011), photo by Peter Jennings. Beckett’s  Endgame is the absurdist model for CHINA DOLL by David Mamet

Pacino and Denham in CHINA DOLL by David Mamet

Ross and Carson ( Al Pacino and Christopher Denham) in CHINA DOLL by David Mamet at the Schoenfeld Theater (Photo by Jeremy Daniel)

 AKA Ann Black, in this Mamet Play, Chess Piece? Conspirator? Spy?

And because his fiancé doesn’t appear in the play, we are invited to imagine her at the end of a phone call. An Aphrodite of our minds. Even there, her imagined presence offers more than Mickey’s picture. The false name that she uses in the hotel in Toronto, Ann Black, is telling. Miss Pearson is more than she appears.

“Black” may refer to her chess piece color and hint at darkness and subterfuge, a hidden agenda. She doesn’t explain why she used a false name when he asks her. Ross doesn’t press her for an answer even when it becomes clear that his legal problems may have nothing to do with tax evasion.

Continue reading

CHINA DOLL by MAMET: A THINK TWICE DRAMA REVIEW

CHINA DOLL Passengers: We Are Experiencing Turbulence

It began with the announcement that Al Pacino would appear in CHINA DOLL, an original play by David Mamet on Broadway.  Fans who will go see Pacino on the big stage no matter what, whether it’s Shake-speare’s Merchant of Venice or Mamet’s American Buffalo—snatched up tickets for the fifteen week run that began at the Schoenfeld Theater in October this year.

That was the pro-Pacino buzz.

And as if from some law of drama physics, a counter-buzz met the pro-buzz with comparable force. This buzz was generated by speculation that the legendary-but-aged Pacino (75) couldn’t remember his lines. Rumors fixated on technical prompting devices that gave his memory assistance. Deriders of CHINA DOLL didn’t have to see the play to form an opinion. They’d heard all they need to know. The anti-Pacino buzz.

Finally, after two months of previews, CHINA DOLL opened in early December. Finally we’ve gotten past the glare of the lead actor’s stardom and honed in on Mamet’s play. Finally we won’t have to listen anymore to the vultures and boo-birds who get off on rooting for someone to fail. The critics have considered the play and set things right. Right? Hmmm. Wrong.

Continue reading

BONOBOS AND DRAMA PART 2

Bonobos in THE QUALMS by Bruce Norris

Bonobos are first mentioned more than halfway through THE QUALMS. Party host Gary says that humans are genetically engineered for warfare. His partner Teri says, “That’s not true. What about bonobos?”   Gary continues, “—look at chimpanzees. Chimps conduct strategic attacks on rival tribes.” After the others protest, he adds, “—to protect their territory.”   Then Teri says, “But Gary, Bonobos resolve conflict through sex instead of aggression and we’re genetically closer to bonobos.”

This déjà vu bonobo lesson got my attention. It was so similar to the bonobo and chimp parable in David Grieg’s THE EVENTS.  [Bonobo Part 1: THE EVENTS] In this instance, however, there was cause to believe Bruce Norris would go further. And he does. His subject in THE QUALMS (Playwrights Horizons May 2015—July 2015) is closer to what has so intrigued us about bonobos, their use of sex to resolve conflict.

The play’s setting is a beach community condo owned by Gary and Teri where four couples have gathered, in theory, for erotic partner swapping. Newcomers Chris and Kristy struggle to fit into the “lifestyle.” Chris, in particular, can’t get past his hierarchal orientation.

The Kiss (Bonobo)

The Kiss (Bonobo) by Gwenn Seemel

His insistence on class distinction is cleverly symbolized by his bringing an expensive bottle of cabernet to the party. Inevitably the red wine and associations with spilt red wine contribute to the crisis.

BONOBO AND CHIMP ZOO CHATTER

Bruce Norris is the author of a dozen or so unsettling, naturalistic comedies, including the Pulitzer Prize winning Claiborne Park. Many like THE QUALMS originated with Steppenwolf Theatre Company.

In his introduction  (Playwrights Horizons Preview Editions), the playwright undersells THE QUALMS with a dry sociological account of the play exploring class competiveness. Sure, there’s that, but without question the eight characters interact as archetypal party animals.  The audience is encouraged to view the beach condo scenario as a human zoo exhibition.

There is a frequent wonderful effect of five or six of the characters talking at the same time. In print these chatterings are formatted in short columns across the page. Each chattering marks a significant juncture in the group dynamic with a cascade of character views that advance the insecurity and tension.

Continue reading

Older posts

© 2024 think twice drama

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑